https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114505
Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-reduction --- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > THis should not case should not being ICE and should be handled correctly. I > am thinking something else is wrong. > > Now the opposite direction is definitely should be a fatal_error instead of > an internal_error. I'm pretty sure I've seen the ICE before (when I forgot to strip the LTO sections from a fat LTO archive built by a "GCC w/o zstd" to produce a non-LTO archive). Just need to find a test case...