https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114477
--- Comment #5 from Jiang An <de34 at live dot cn> --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > Since P3059R0 is closed (although I feel bad about this) BTW, now I think this is somehow unfortunate. P3059 behaved like a follow-up paper of P2711 IMO. Both papers effectively suggested that "some design choices of C++23 views are better, let's apply them to C++20 views".
