https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |12.3.0
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-26
Blocks| |53947
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail| |13.1.0
Summary|[14] Wrong code with -O3 |[13/14 Regression] Wrong
|-march=rv64gcv on riscv |code with -O3
| |-march=rv64gcv on riscv or
| |`-O3 -march=armv9-a` for
| |aarch64
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. Yes it does look very similar if not the same.
This one does not even need -fno-vect-cost-model nor -fwrapv for aarch64 even.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
[Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations