https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84411
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |19661
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This depends on PR 19661.
But then we still need to remove:
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
_1 = __atomic_load_1 (&_ZGVZ8get_basevE1d, 2);
if (_1 == 0)
goto <bb 4>; [33.00%]
else
goto <bb 3>; [67.00%]
<bb 3> [local count: 956811341]:
goto <bb 6>; [100.00%]
<bb 4> [local count: 354334800]:
_2 = __cxa_guard_acquire (&_ZGVZ8get_basevE1d);
if (_2 != 0)
goto <bb 5>; [33.00%]
else
goto <bb 3>; [67.00%]
<bb 5> [local count: 116930483]:
__cxa_guard_release (&_ZGVZ8get_basevE1d);
Note clang/LLVM does not remove the use of the guard here either, even though
it does remove the __cxa_atexit.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
[Bug 19661] unnecessary atexit calls emitted for static objects with empty
destructors
