https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114269
Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Summary|[14 Regression] Multiple |[14 Regression] Multiple
|3-27% exec time regressions |3-6% exec time regressions
|of 434.zeusmp since |of 434.zeusmp since
|r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 |r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033
--- Comment #7 from Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Nice, our LNT instance already shows that the patch sped up 434.zeusmp. However
I'd like to reopen this bug since the benchmark didn't return to its original
values. At least some configurations are still slower than before
r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033:
Intel Skylake -Ofast -march=native (~5% regression)
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=798.80.0
Intel Skylake -Ofast -march=native -flto PGO (~5% regression)
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=785.80.0
AMD Zen3 -Ofast -march=native -flto (~6% regression)
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=476.80.0
AMD Zen3 -Ofast -march=native -flto PGO (~4% regression)
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=474.80.0
AMD Zen2 -Ofast -march=native -flto (~3% regression)
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=289.80.0
