https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111126

--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Multiply as a canonical form of a conditional move/zero seems fairly
non-obvious relative to a conditional expression.

But I don't mind going with consensus on a canonical form.  After all we just
need to define one.

The bigger question is fixing the expansion.

We can expand as a multiply, x&-y or with a conditional-move like sequence.

Reply via email to