https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112919
--- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to chenglulu from comment #8) > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7) > > Any update? :) > > Well, I haven't run it yet. Since this does not have a big impact on the > spec score, I am currently testing it on a single-channel machine, so the > test time will be longer. > I will reply here as soon as the results are available. Can we determine on LA664 if the current default alignment is better than not aligning at all? Coremarks results suggest the current default is even worse than not aligning, but arguably Coremarks is far different from real workloads. However if the current default is not better than not aligning (or the difference is only marginal and is likely covered up by some random fluctuation) we can disable the aligning for LA664. (Maybe we and the HW engineers have done some repetitive work or even some work cancelling each other out :(. )
