https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Maybe not, feels like a scheduling change:
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ f:
mv s0,a0
sw a2,1064(sp)
sw a3,1068(sp)
- sw a0,1056(sp)
sw a1,1060(sp)
+ sw a0,1056(sp)
call __floatsidf
lw a2,1064(sp)
lw a3,1068(sp)
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ g:
sw ra,1036(sp)
sw s1,1028(sp)
.LCFI14:
- sw a0,1040(sp)
mv s4,a0
+ sw a0,1040(sp)
sw a1,1044(sp)
sw a2,1048(sp)
sw a3,1052(sp)
Anyway, there are no other TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P uses in function.cc.