https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Maybe not, feels like a scheduling change:
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ f:
        mv      s0,a0
        sw      a2,1064(sp)
        sw      a3,1068(sp)
-       sw      a0,1056(sp)
        sw      a1,1060(sp)
+       sw      a0,1056(sp)
        call    __floatsidf
        lw      a2,1064(sp)
        lw      a3,1068(sp)
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ g:
        sw      ra,1036(sp)
        sw      s1,1028(sp)
 .LCFI14:
-       sw      a0,1040(sp)
        mv      s4,a0
+       sw      a0,1040(sp)
        sw      a1,1044(sp)
        sw      a2,1048(sp)
        sw      a3,1052(sp)
Anyway, there are no other TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P uses in function.cc.

Reply via email to