https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114103
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2024-02-26 7:22 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > OK then I think we don't want these aliases to be defined at all (which means > we cannot be fully C++20 conformant) and the test should be xfailed or > skipped. That's what I was thinking.
