https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113712
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #18) > (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #17) > > I've bisected this (using the test from Andrew Pinski) to > > r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797 > > That's a coincidence, with -fno-ipa-sra the testcase fails even earlier, > IPA-SRA was just hiding it, most probably by localizing some symbol before > the linking stage. > > Bugs that are only reproducible with -fno-use-linker-plugin are unlikely to > get a high priority. But I understand that the original issue does not need > it? I am not 100% sure if the original reported issue had been using the LTO plugin because I could not reproduce it when using the plugin. > > (Also, the issue is supposed to be reproducible ton x86_64-linux, right?) Yes it is supposed to be reproducible on x86_64; I reduced it there.