https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113673

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #4)
> The identified patch implements += the same way as |=.  Presumably a version
> of the test case replacing "m += *data++;" with "m |= *data++;" would be
> more useful at identifying a patch that actually changed EH edges.

Well + can trap on overflow with -ftrapv (and cause exceptions with
-fnon-call-exceptions) but | will not/cannot trap ...
So that patch is definitely the one which changes the EH edges.

Reply via email to