https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87744
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Why not just
> __l._M_hi += __builtin_uaddll_overflow(__l._M_lo, __c,
> &__l._M_lo);
> and similarly for subtraction?
No good reason - I'll change it.
> Is the reason for using the clang compat builtins instead of
> __builtin_{add,sub,mul}_overflow the compatibility with clang versions which
> don't
> support these?
Again, no reason, I was just using the ones specific to the type because all
the types are fixed.
Thanks for the suggestions.
