https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113763
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yup, no constructor needed, just make it an aggregate. I've created PR 113782 for the non-conforming constexpr in libstdc++.
redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Tue, 06 Feb 2024 02:42:53 -0800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113763
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yup, no constructor needed, just make it an aggregate. I've created PR 113782 for the non-conforming constexpr in libstdc++.