https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113767
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=92407
Summary|Missing Destructor Call |[11/12/13 Regression]
|with goto and return value |Missing Destructor Call
| |with goto and return value
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk after r14-1593-g7e0b65b239c3a0, where we get the expected output
Cons
Dest
Cons
Dest
and indeed this seems closely related or even a dup of PR92407 the fix for
which has been backported for 11.5/12.4/13.3/14.
However, using the latest 13/12/11 release branches containing the backported
fix I see we now output
Cons
Dest
Cons
Dest
Dest
instead of
Cons
Cons
Dest
which still seems wrong? (Not sure if generating different wrong code is
considered a regression..)
