https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #11 from Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Oh interesting. So the purpose of this test was just to record that GCC > outputs > incorrect locations for this case, I wanted to xfail it and then fix it > properly for GCC 15. I did not consider that it might output different wrong > locations for different platforms, but I could buy that it may happen, for a > similar reason why this switched from being silently broken to ICEing since > r11-338 which was seemingly unrelated. It seems like in one case the wrong > location is inside the header file and in the other case, the wrong location > is > the line just following the include. It may have to do with line endings or > some other issue with the treatment of EOF? If this test is causing problems > we It's still weird given that it's exactly the same version of Solaris on both SPARC and x86. > could just skip it on some architectures maybe? Once the underlying issue is I guess that's best for now. I'll check if the test behaves differently for a 64-bit-default (amd64-pc-solaris2.11) compiler. > fixed, the location (line 2 of the .C file) will be correct everywhere. I am > curious why it gets a different wrong output though, if there is a compile > farm > machine with this architecture I could look into it. There's no Solaris/x86 system in the cfarm right now, unfortunately. The only one runs Solaris 11.3/SPARC, where the test works just like everywhere else. That said, I've accquired systems to add to the cfarm that will both be running current Solaris 11.4 (SPARC and x86). I'm working on installing and integrating them as we speak, but I don't have an ETA yet.
