https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Just to put it somewhere I ran dwlocstat on cc1plus before/after the > offending change and it looks almost the same. We go from > > cov% samples cumul > 0..10 1280217/38% 1280217/38% > 11..20 55668/1% 1335885/40% > 21..30 68004/2% 1403889/42% > 31..40 70774/2% 1474663/44% > 41..50 75554/2% 1550217/46% > 51..60 91816/2% 1642033/49% > 61..70 101139/3% 1743172/52% > 71..80 135281/4% 1878453/56% > 81..90 198470/5% 2076923/62% > 91..100 1233822/37% 3310745/100% > > to > > cov% samples cumul > 0..10 1280197/38% 1280197/38% > 11..20 55669/1% 1335866/40% > 21..30 68014/2% 1403880/42% > 31..40 70773/2% 1474653/44% > 41..50 75542/2% 1550195/46% > 51..60 91800/2% 1641995/49% > 61..70 101133/3% 1743128/52% > 71..80 135259/4% 1878387/56% > 81..90 198496/5% 2076883/62% > 91..100 1233844/37% 3310727/100% And with up-to-date elfutils to avoid some DWARF5 issues cov% samples cumul 0..10 1280347/38% 1280347/38% 11..20 55720/1% 1336067/40% 21..30 68040/2% 1404107/42% 31..40 70805/2% 1474912/44% 41..50 75585/2% 1550497/46% 51..60 91850/2% 1642347/49% 61..70 101224/3% 1743571/52% 71..80 135406/4% 1878977/56% 81..90 198509/5% 2077486/62% 91..100 1233880/37% 3311366/100% to cov% samples cumul 0..10 1280327/38% 1280327/38% 11..20 55721/1% 1336048/40% 21..30 68050/2% 1404098/42% 31..40 70804/2% 1474902/44% 41..50 75573/2% 1550475/46% 51..60 91834/2% 1642309/49% 61..70 101218/3% 1743527/52% 71..80 135384/4% 1878911/56% 81..90 198535/5% 2077446/62% 91..100 1233902/37% 3311348/100%
