https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112600
Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, this is hurting us a lot on vectors as well:
https://godbolt.org/z/ecnGadxcG
The first one isn't vectorizable and the second one we generates too
complicated code as the pattern vec_cond is expanded to something quite
complicated.
It was too complicated for the intern we had at the time, but I think basically
we should still do the conclusion of this thread no?
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/msg95398.html
i.e. we should just make proper saturating IFN.
The only remaining question is, should we make them optab backed or can we do
something reasonably better for most target with better fallback code.
This seems to indicate yes since the REALPART_EXPR seems to screw things up a
bit.
