https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112980
--- Comment #3 from Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #1) > > As Segher's review comments in [2], to support "before NOPs" before global > entry and "after NOPs" after global entry, Just to be perfectly clear here: the "after NOPs" need to come after local entry (which strictly speaking is of course after the global one as well, but I'm being anal :) ).
