https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104634
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppa...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47673571b28278d857371167f4b67a04a1b87b59 commit r14-7261-g47673571b28278d857371167f4b67a04a1b87b59 Author: Patrick Palka <ppa...@redhat.com> Date: Mon Jan 15 16:53:28 2024 -0500 c++: explicit inst w/ similar constrained partial specs [PR104634] Here we neglect to emit the definitions of A<double>::f2 and A<double*>::f4 despite the explicit instantiations ultimately because TREE_PUBLIC isn't set on the corresponding partial specializations, whose declarations are created from maybe_new_partial_specialization which is responsible for disambiguating them from the first and third partial specializations (which have the same class-head but different constraints). This makes grokfndecl in turn clear TREE_PUBLIC for f2 and f4 as if they have internal linkage. This patch fixes this by setting TREE_PUBLIC appropriately for such partial specializations. PR c++/104634 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (maybe_new_partial_specialization): Propagate TREE_PUBLIC to the newly created partial specialization. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-explicit-inst6.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
