https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113182

--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c05beab4ae240a593299c08ef8c775d91187a141

commit r14-7188-gc05beab4ae240a593299c08ef8c775d91187a141
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Jan 12 13:58:07 2024 +0100

    varasm: Fix up process_pending_assemble_externals [PR113182]

    John reported that on HP-UX we no longer emit needed external libcalls.

    The problem is that we didn't strip name encoding when looking up
    the identifiers in assemble_external_libcall and
    process_pending_assemble_externals, while
    assemble_name_resolve does that:
      const char *real_name = targetm.strip_name_encoding (name);
      tree id = maybe_get_identifier (real_name);

      if (id)
        {
    ...
          mark_referenced (id);
    The intention is that assemble_external_libcall ensures the IDENTIFIER
    exists for the external libcall, then for actually emitted calls
    assemble_name_resolve sees those IDENTIFIERS and sets
TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED
    on them and finally process_pending_assemble_externals looks the
    IDENTIFIER up again and checks its TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED.

    But without the strip_name_encoding call, they can look up different
    identifiers and those are likely never used.

    In the PR, John was discussing whether get_identifier or
    maybe_get_identifier should be used, I believe in assemble_external_libcall
    we definitely want to use get_identifier, we need an IDENTIFIER allocated
    so that it can be actually tracked, in process_pending_assemble_externals
    it doesn't matter, the IDENTIFIER should be already created.

    2024-01-12  John David Anglin  <dang...@gcc.gnu.org>
                Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

            PR middle-end/113182
            * varasm.cc (process_pending_assemble_externals,
            assemble_external_libcall): Use targetm.strip_name_encoding
            before calling get_identifier.

Reply via email to