[Bug tree-optimization/113301] [12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization: (1/(x+1))/2 => 0 since gcc-12

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113301

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thinking about if 1/x or (x+1u) <= 2 ? x : 0 is more conconial for gimple. I
suspect 1/x is . Which case this should be move to late gimple. I will look at
that tomorrow.