https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113130
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Oh right but the following testcase it should be valid to do and not worry about INT_MIN either: ``` int f(int a, unsigned short c) { // c = 1; int b = a > 0 ? a : -a; return b == c; } int f1(int a, unsigned short c) { // c = 1; return a == -c || a == c; } ```