https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113054
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #7) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > Note I also don't like how dead_stmts is a static variable either but that > > would be for another change. > > How should I get rid of the static variable? Maybe wrap the copy propagation > algorithm in a class as I wrapped the SCC finding algorithm? Yes that would most likely be the way I would do it. and then init_sccopy/finalize_sccopy becomes constructors/deconstructors ...
