https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113066
Bug ID: 113066 Summary: Returning from a function marked noreturn allows execution to fall-through Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: translation Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: luke.geeson at cs dot ucl.ac.uk Target Milestone: --- Consider the following program. ``` [[noreturn]] inline void ub_if_reached() { return; } void P0 () { atomic_store_explicit(y,1,memory_order_release); ub_if_reached(); } ``` If compiled to target Armv8-a using `clang -O3` (https://godbolt.org/z/T33Yncjsh), the whole of `P0` is optimised away. This is because `ub_if_reached` is marked as `noreturn` which means this function should not return, however the `return` statement does exactly that, inducing undefined behaviour. Clang warns of this behaviour, and optimises away the code in `P0` before the call, since it assumes a program is UB-free and that `P0` is therefore unreachable. Further if we define an `f` that calls a `g` that calls `P0` from `main` then all functions including `main` are also optimised away (https://godbolt.org/z/qsraYr7o5). Technically the standards and compiler are not required to do anything here as there is UB, however if this program is compiled and linked with a program that calls `P0` then the resultant execution may fallthrough to the code below `P0`. Both GCC and LLVM allow `P0` to fallthrough - this is not good and only functions guaranteed to return should be subject to this optimisation. In practice we can fix this by: - emitting an explicit abort (or undefined instruction that causes a trap) at the end of `noreturn` functions like `ub_if_reached`, or - if the compiler can statically determine that a `noreturn` function does in fact `return` then ignore the noreturn attribute, and emit an abort on return. As far as I can tell, this behaviour arises in clang, but clang has an optional `-mllvm -trap-unreachable` to prevent this behaviour. I was made aware that GCC has `-fsanitize=undefined` `-fsanitize-trap=undefined` for this, but these seem to be general options. It would be good for GCC to have a flag similar to `-mllvm -trap-unreachable`. Disclaimer: The views of the authors expressed in this bug report are my own and are not endorsed by Arm or any other company mentioned.