https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112876

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-12-08
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, I think I should fix this. But I'm checking with LWG whether we want to
change the issue's proposed resolution to use the iterator this way.

My feeling is that we should not do this, and I should just fix the libstdc++
code.

Thanks for pointing it out!

Reply via email to