https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112849
--- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat <ibhagat at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think its also a good idea to propose a patch to btf.rst upstream to clearly
state something to the like of:
- What variables have an associated BTF_KIND_DATASEC entry
- In "2.2.15 BTF_KIND_DATASEC"
"struct btf_type" encoding requirement:
* "name_off": offset to a valid name associated with a variable or
one of .data/.bss/.rodata
--> change to -->
* "name_off": offset to a valid section name associated with a variable
or one of .data/.bss/.rodata
