https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112830
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note we end up trying to expand a memcpy between different address spaces and that does addr = expand_expr (orig_exp, NULL_RTX, ptr_mode, EXPAND_NORMAL); mem = gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, memory_address (BLKmode, addr)); which assumes the default address-space. The get_memory_rtx () function also doesn't correctly preserve the address-space for the MEM_EXPR. The following fixes the ICE and tries to correct the MEM_EXPR. But I wonder if the actual code generation is sane? It also appears we'd eventually emit a call to memcpy as we call emit_block_move_hints with BLOCK_OP_NORMAL which sets may_use_call to 1. So, can you check whether we generate correct code with the following patch? Otherwise we should keep it ICEing (wrong-code is IMHO worse). diff --git a/gcc/builtins.cc b/gcc/builtins.cc index 4fc58a0bda9..244863699be 100644 --- a/gcc/builtins.cc +++ b/gcc/builtins.cc @@ -1353,7 +1353,8 @@ get_memory_rtx (tree exp, tree len) exp = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0); addr = expand_expr (orig_exp, NULL_RTX, ptr_mode, EXPAND_NORMAL); - mem = gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, memory_address (BLKmode, addr)); + addr_space_t as = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (exp))); + mem = gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, memory_address_addr_space (BLKmode, addr, as)); /* Get an expression we can use to find the attributes to assign to MEM. First remove any nops. */ @@ -1363,8 +1364,11 @@ get_memory_rtx (tree exp, tree len) /* Build a MEM_REF representing the whole accessed area as a byte blob, (as builtin stringops may alias with anything). */ + tree ctype = char_type_node; + if (as != ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC) + ctype = build_qualified_type (ctype, ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (as)); exp = fold_build2 (MEM_REF, - build_array_type (char_type_node, + build_array_type (ctype, build_range_type (sizetype, size_one_node, len)), exp, build_int_cst (ptr_type_node, 0)); @@ -1381,7 +1385,7 @@ get_memory_rtx (tree exp, tree len) unsigned int align = get_pointer_alignment (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0)); exp = build_fold_addr_expr (base); exp = fold_build2 (MEM_REF, - build_array_type (char_type_node, + build_array_type (ctype, build_range_type (sizetype, size_zero_node, NULL)),