https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112573
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The rev issue is recorded seperately already.
The difference between f and h are due to reassociation .
In f, (y+CST) can overflow so it is not reassociated with the addition with &a.
While h the addition is done in pointer size (64bit) so it can be reassociated
and you get that effect.
