https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93271
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- It is even worse with `int128_t` and `long double` due to `long double` having padding bits (and a padding byte). So it is not only denormals but even bits in the padding bits/byte that might get lost.
