https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112384
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh f2 just goes to memory.
Produces:
```
and x0, x0, 3
str q0, [sp]
ldr s0, [sp, x0, lsl 2]
dup v0.4s, v0.s[0]
```
Now clang(LLVM) produces:
```
mov x8, sp
and w9, w0, #0x3
str q0, [sp]
orr x8, x8, x9, lsl #2
ld1r { v0.4s }, [x8]
```
I don't know which is better but it might be the case where GCC's is better for
some micro-arch.
