https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79021
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes this was the same issue as PR 94742 . I will note in the original testcase,
the f call inside h was not a depedent call would have been resolved and if you
make it a depedent call, then you run into the same issue as the generic
lambda. Or if you change the call to f inside the generic lambda to being
non-depedent, you don't get the warning.
So this is all fixed with a testcase added already.
