https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111854
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- as explained. GCC correctly rejects: ``` #include <new> struct T { void* operator new(std::size_t, std::size_t); // Placement allocation function void operator delete(void*, std::size_t); // now considered a usual deallocation function }; T* p = new (0) T; // error: usual deallocation function would be chosen as placement deallocation function ```