https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111854

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
as explained.

GCC correctly rejects:
```
#include <new>
struct T {
    void* operator new(std::size_t, std::size_t); // Placement allocation
function
    void operator delete(void*, std::size_t); // now considered a usual
deallocation function
};

T* p = new (0) T;

// error: usual deallocation function would be chosen as placement deallocation
function
```

Reply via email to