https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92798

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Joseph Tilahun from comment #4)
> Is there a reason why the _Rb_tree_color
> enum does not have an explicit underlying type?

Yes because it has to work with C++98 while enums with underlying types was
only added for C++11.

Again -fshort-enums changes the ABI so you can't use that option unless you
compile everything with it.

Reply via email to