https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111619

Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[14 regression] 'make       |'make profiledbootstrap'
                   |profiledbootstrap' makes    |makes 10+ minutes on
                   |10+ minutes on              |insn-recog.cc
                   |insn-recog.cc               |(x86_64-linux)
                   |(x86_64-linux)              |

--- Comment #11 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Tried releases/gcc-12 branch and it's twice as bad: 20 minutes. Removing
`Regression` from the subject.

$ time /tmp/gb/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/tmp/gb/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++
-B/tmp/gb/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/tmp/gb/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs
-I/tmp/gb/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-I/tmp/gb/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-L/tmp/gb/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/tmp/gb/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -fno-PIE -c -g
-O2 -fno-checking -gtoggle -fprofile-generate -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc -I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc/.
-I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc/../include
-I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include
-I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc/../libcody
-I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/bid -I../libdecnumber
-I/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o insn-recog.o -MT insn-recog.o
-MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/insn-recog.TPo insn-recog.cc

real    21m24,065s
user    21m21,966s
sys     0m1,135s

Reply via email to