https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111561
Bug ID: 111561
Summary: Missed optimization of available expression in if
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn
Target Milestone: ---
Hello, we found some optimizations (regarding Available Expression in If
condition) that GCC may have missed. We would greatly appreicate if you can
take a look and let us know what you think.
Here are two examples:
Example 1:
https://godbolt.org/z/vjWM5c93j
Given the following code:
```c++
extern int var_26;
extern int var_29;
void test(int var_1, int var_2, int var_3) {
var_29 = (var_1 + var_2) ? var_1 : var_2; //line 4
var_26 = var_1 + (var_2 + var_3); //can be replaced with the value at line
4
}
```
We note that `var_1+var_2` at line 5 in the test code can be replaced with the
value at line 4, but gcc-trunk -O3 does not:
```asm
test(int, int, int):
mov eax, edi
add eax, esi
mov eax, edi
cmove eax, esi
add esi, edx
add esi, edi
mov DWORD PTR var_29[rip], eax
mov DWORD PTR var_26[rip], esi
ret
```
Example 2:
https://godbolt.org/z/31d8v453v
Given the following code:
```c++
extern int var_24;
extern int var_25;
void test(int var_0, int var_1, int var_12) {
var_24 = (var_1 + var_12 + var_0) ? 1 : 2;
var_25 = var_12 + var_0;
}
```
We note that `var_12+var_0` at line 5 in the test code can be replaced with the
value at line 4, but gcc-trunk -O3 does not:
```asm
test(int, int, int):
add esi, edx
xor eax, eax
add esi, edi
sete al
add edx, edi
add eax, 1
mov DWORD PTR var_25[rip], edx
mov DWORD PTR var_24[rip], eax
ret
```
Thank you very much for your time and effort! We look forward to hearing from
you.