https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111455
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2023-09-18 See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=111357 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Isn't this just PR 111357? Or at least, its root cause. I said in the libstdc++ backports that the compiler bug had been fixed on trunk, but that's not quite true, it has been mitigated for now. The actual bug is still present though: the argument *should* be an integer already by the time it gets to __integer_pack. Do we need two PRs for it though?