https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111394
Sayu <aiya64bits at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #3 from Sayu <aiya64bits at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> N could be -1 which then would access out of bounds ..
>
> I suspect if you add a check for n being negative in memoized_cut_rod the
> warning will go away and a security issue is solved too.
I see. I didn't realize that negative indexes are allowed in C, I always
assumed it was undefined behavior or just invalid. However, what does "*r_30 +
_122" mean in the warning?
