https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111337
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- vect_patt_67.34_168 = VEC_COND_EXPR <mask__5.33_165, { 1, ... }, { 0, ... }>; vect_patt_68.35_169 = (vector([4,4]) int) vect_patt_67.34_168; -> vect_patt_68.35_169 = VEC_COND_EXPR <mask__5.33_165, { 1, ... }, { 0, ... }>; this one looks odd - it's probably /* Sink unary conversions to branches, but only if we do fold both and the target's truth type is the same as we already have. */ (simplify (convert (vec_cond:s @0 @1 @2)) (if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type) && types_match (TREE_TYPE (@0), truth_type_for (type))) (vec_cond @0 (convert! @1) (convert! @2)))) the problem is that this happily produces a vec_cond we might not be able to expand - having the same truth type for the data type isn't enough if there's no optab with a matching data mode. Same for the view_convert case. It's a bit convoluted to ask for target support here, can you double-check it isn't possible to add native riscv expanders for the missing case?