https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111349

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pins...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b59e9de990a17bfd5fa7252b76339c35bff7f2e8

commit r14-3842-gb59e9de990a17bfd5fa7252b76339c35bff7f2e8
Author: Andrew Pinski <apin...@marvell.com>
Date:   Sun Sep 10 21:58:12 2023 -0700

    MATCH: [PR111349] add missing :c to cmp in the `(a CMP CST1) ? max<a,CST2>
: a` pattern

    When I added this pattern in r14-1411-g17cca3c43e2f49, I had missed the :c
on the cmp
    part of the pattern meaning there might be some missing optimizations
happening.
    The testcase shows an example of the missed optmization.

    Committed as obvious after a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu.

            PR tree-optimization/111349

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * match.pd (`(a CMP CST1) ? max<a,CST2> : a`): Add :c on
            the cmp part of the pattern.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-25.c: New test.

Reply via email to