https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111294
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2023-09-05
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
>
> But _32 will be 0, _4 will be 0, j_22 will be 0, _33 will be 0.
> But I think jump threading does not recognize j_22 will be 0 on that edge
> and considers it a copy ... I think.
after:
Checking profitability of path (backwards): bb:7 (4 insns) bb:5
Control statement insns: 2
Overall: 2 insns
before:
Checking profitability of path (backwards): bb:7 (3 insns) bb:5
Control statement insns: 2
Overall: 1 insns
Actually I think it is counting an already dead statement. The statement:
_32 = (charD.10) _31;
is dead but is being counted.
