[Bug tree-optimization/67628] [tree-optimization] (a && b) && c shows better codegen than a && (b && c)

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |pinskia at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine. 

I have ideas on how to fix ifcombine here to allow defining statements but only
if they are boolean in type ...