https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, though this PR has more info.

grep 1[ik]1[jl] pr111069-2.s | grep :
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_0:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_0:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_0:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_0:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_1:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_1:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_1:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_1:
shows that for inline functions I think clang++ mangling is right.

Reply via email to