https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111069
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yes, though this PR has more info. grep 1[ik]1[jl] pr111069-2.s | grep : _ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE: _ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE: _ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_0: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_0: _ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_0: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_0: _ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_1: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_1: _ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_1: _ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_1: shows that for inline functions I think clang++ mangling is right.