https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111009
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> --- > At the hazard of stating the obvious: it's a wrong-code when you execute it > (not a gcc ICE). > doh. of course. test is in progress. Richi was correct. Although the code in range-ops for fold_range is correct, op1_range cannot make the same assumptions that fold_range does because it has no concept of the symbolic values on the RHS. I am making op1_range more restrictive.
