https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hp at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A quick survey of recent test-results show this regression happens for many
targets.

Besides the reported:
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793193.html

Also fails for:
pru-unknown-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792102.html

s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792106.html

m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793249.html

cris-axis-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793462.html

But, curiously not for:
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792111.html

i686-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792104.html

aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793190.html

arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793191.html

Not seeing any action for this regression for three weeks, for tracking
purposes I'm considering xfailing this test-case for cris-* after another week.

Reply via email to