https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110952
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2023-08-09
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=57272
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kamil Kaznowski from comment #0)
> It is NOT a duplicate of Bug 57272 - it's not about the internal
> representation of the nodes, just handling and requirements imposed on the
> allocator pointer.
It is though, because if we actually used the allocator's pointer then this
wouldn't be an issue in the first place.
The changes need to be conditional on C++11 or later, because pointer_traits
and __to_address aren't available in C++98.
