https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100805

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=84764

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For C2x and C++23 __int128 can be an extended integer type, so we don't need to
pretend it doesn't exist.

Reply via email to