https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110516

--- Comment #2 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Witold Baryluk from comment #0)
> I did not test volatileStore, but I would not be surprised it is also broken.
volatileStore is fine, because that expands to an assignment, which is assumed
to have a side effect.

Reply via email to