https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110486

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The question is the second lamdba implicitly consteval or not ...

If it is, then the bug is dealing with that. That is adding consteval to the
second lamdba allows GCC to accept the code.

Reply via email to