https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110477
--- Comment #8 from Peter Dimov <pdimov at gmail dot com> --- As I commented on the duplicate bug, I don't think this behavior is allowed by https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.fcon#3. "If the scaled value is not in the range of representable values for its type, the program is ill-formed. Otherwise, the value of a floating-point-literal is the scaled value if representable, else the larger or smaller representable value nearest the scaled value, chosen in an implementation-defined manner." I don't see any license here for the value of 3.14f to be 3.14L.
