https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rguenth at gcc dot 
gnu.org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> > So it looks like a generic problem and better to be handled in
> > expand_partial_{load, store}_optab_fn?
> 
> There're many other places with assumption MEM_SIZE is equal to MODE_SIZE
> even !MEM_SIZE_KNOWN_P, .i.e. ao_ref_base will rewrite size to MODE_SIZE.

Yes, that's because MEM_EXPR isn't really correct ... I guess we could
work around that in ao_ref_from_mem but expand_partial_store_optab_fn
is wrong in setting that.

There's no "partial memory" MEM, and AFAIK the memory attributes are
only additional info and ignoring them is valid, so indeed a pass
could at least interpret inputs and outputs in mode size even when
UNSPECs are involved.  But it must not(?) interpret them as must uses
or kills?

I also think that MEM_SIZE is really only relevant for BLKmode MEMs,
MEM_OFFSET is only relevant for interpreting MEM_EXPR.

Clearing MEM_EXPR and MEM_SIZE results in an ICE:

#0  fancy_abort (file=0x31ce278
"/space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/rtlanal.cc", line=469, 
    function=0x31d0560 <rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1(rtx_def const*, poly_int<1u,
long>, poly_int<1u, long>, machine_mode, bool)::__FUNCTION__>
"rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1") at
/space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/diagnostic.cc:2232
#1  0x000000000158b62b in rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1 (x=0x7ffff6d51798, offset=...,
size=..., mode=E_V16SImode, unaligned_mems=false)
    at /space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/rtlanal.cc:467
#2  0x0000000001591a2d in may_trap_p_1 (x=0x7ffff6d51780, flags=0) at
/space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/rtlanal.cc:3160
#3  0x0000000001591f64 in may_trap_p (x=0x7ffff6d51780) at
/space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/rtlanal.cc:3283
#4  0x00000000015f32e6 in simplify_context::simplify_ternary_operation
(this=0x7fffffffcd28, code=VEC_MERGE, mode=E_V16SImode, 
    op0_mode=E_V16SImode, op0=0x7ffff6e21d90, op1=0x7ffff6d51780,
op2=0x7ffff6d51108)
    at /space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc:7040
#5  0x0000000000f590c7 in simplify_ternary_operation (code=VEC_MERGE,
mode=E_V16SImode, op0_mode=E_V16SImode, op0=0x7ffff6e21d90, 
    op1=0x7ffff6d51780, op2=0x7ffff6d51108) at
/space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/rtl.h:3498

(gdb) p debug_rtx (op1)
(mem:V16SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 113)
        (reg:DI 90 [ _22 ])) [1  A32])

where I have only preserved MEM_ALIAS_SET and MEM_ALIGN.  It insists
on knowing the MEMs size if it's not BLKmode or VOIDmode.  Indeed
from the mode we can derived its size.

So we can simply clear only MEM_EXPR (and MEM_OFFSET), that cuts off the
problematic part of alias analysis.  Together with UNSPEC this might be
enough to fix things.

I'm going to test such a patch and seek for feedback on the mailing list.

Reply via email to